Should Be Worried About Toys Because They Can Get Violent?

11.4.2020 | 11:01

Should Be Worried About Toys Because They Can Get Violent?

A New Zealand research has reported that Lego is becoming more violent because the late 1970s. Debates about degrees of violence in children’s media aren’t brand new, so is that important? When we believe that Lego is famed because of its own principles of pacifism we are tempted to believe so. We have to be careful, however, about these headlines leading to ill-informed ethical worries about the loss of childhood innocence and also a toy “arms race” inducing kids to become more competitive.

The analysis analyzed the varying percentage of Lego bricks which are weapons and Lego sets which contain weapons within the span 1978-2014.

But while we may attempt to safeguard kids in the more morally and ethically challenging elements of modern life, believing we could insulate children from the planet we are living in is a falsehood.

Changing Societal Worth

Critics of warfare play often treat play as though it happens in such a societal network, with little thought of the wider societal context in which play occurs. Social and cultural values change with time and it’s foolhardy to believe that play and toys won’t stick to these tendencies. Growing levels of aggression inside toys need to be regarded as part of a broader trend within society involving desensitisation of violence.

When reflecting on the trend reported in the analysis, economic factors also must be taken under account. Toy businesses have to create a saleable merchandise and this will become a product reflective of broader social trends. Here we’re seeing tendencies towards fantasy situations centred on beating literary evils.

Scholars demonstrate that this is part of broader cultures of anxiety within the article 9/11 era. Childhood isn’t a world of innocence magically protected in the broader world it has an active role in forming it.

Learning From Kids?

As adults we must consider that kids don’t cure toys because we may do, as stationary objects suspended in time which are made to convey specific messages into passive minds. Play is all about copying and surprise mimicking what we see around us and experimentation with principles and functions, and the way things may be different.

Comprehensive reviews of drama study also have emphasized that perceptions of aggression inside children could possibly be due to adult misreadings of specific sorts of drama. Instead of being worried about displays of aggression, play fighting often about social bonding involving sisters and friends. War situations tend to be passionate expressions of detailed understanding about specific characters and fantasy worlds portrayed in books, TV and movies.

As play is an essential means whereby children learn how to take care of doubt, assess risk and build endurance, can it be appropriate to seek to limit types of drama that we, as adults, as could on the surface watch as harder?

Regardless of the longstanding “warfare play disagreement”, we nevertheless don’t have a suitable and adequate evidence base for analyzing the connection between violence and toys.

It is, nevertheless, clear that we must see toys at a wider cultural and social context instead of creating the fast leap to condemn them as scapegoats to our changing values.

Comments are closed